Date
20 September 2019
Huawei has described a US case against a Chinese professor linked to the firm as another example of ‘selective prosecution’. Photo: Reuters
Huawei has described a US case against a Chinese professor linked to the firm as another example of ‘selective prosecution’. Photo: Reuters

US charges Chinese professor in Huawei-linked case

US prosecutors have charged a Chinese professor with fraud for allegedly taking technology from a California company to benefit Huawei, Reuters reports.

Bo Mao was arrested in Texas on Aug. 14 and released six days later on US$100,000 bond after he consented to proceed with the case in New York, according to the report.

He pleaded not guilty in a Brooklyn court on Aug. 28 to a charge of conspiring to commit wire fraud.

According to the criminal complaint, Mao entered into an agreement with the unnamed California tech company to obtain its circuit board, claiming it was for academic research.

The complaint, however, accuses an unidentified Chinese telecommunications conglomerate, which is believed to be Huawei, of trying to steal the technology, and alleges Mao played a role in the suspected scheme.

A court document indicates the case is related to Huawei, according to the report.

Mao, an associate professor at Xiamen University in China, became a visiting professor at a Texas university last fall. He first gained attention as part of a Texas civil case between Huawei and Silicon Valley startup CNEX Labs.

In December 2017, Huawei brought a lawsuit against CNEX and a former employee, Yiren Huang, claiming theft of trade secrets.

Huang, a former engineering manager at a US Huawei subsidiary, helped start CNEX in 2013 three days after leaving the company.

In a counterclaim, CNEX said Mao had asked for one of its circuit boards for a research project and that, after it sent the board to the professor, he used it for a study tied to Huawei.

That case ended in June with a “take nothing” judgment.

A jury did not find CNEX stole trade secrets from Huawei but decided Huang violated his employment contract by not notifying Huawei of patents he obtained within a year of leaving. However, the jury found Huawei was not harmed and did not award any damages.

The jury did find Huawei misappropriated CNEX trade secrets but awarded no damages on that claim, either.

Now, US prosecutors, who have an case against Huawei in Brooklyn for alleged bank fraud and Iran sanctions violations, have revived the CNEX case, the report said.

Although Huawei has not been charged, the company said it views the case against Mao as the US government’s latest instance of “selective prosecution.”

“U.S. federal prosecutors are charging forward with CNEX’s allegations,” a Huawei spokesman said in a statement, adding that prosecutors had shown no interest in Huawei’s claims against CNEX.

The spokesman noted that the US was charging Mao even though the professor was never sued by CNEX and never called to testify at the civil trial.

A hearing in the criminal case against Mao is scheduled for Wednesday.

– Contact us at [email protected]

RC