Why the Emergency Regulations Ordinance may be needed

During a protest rally at Victoria Park on Aug. 18, some participants addressed the crowd and said that they saw themselves as Hongkongers, and not Chinese.
Based on what I heard through the live television broadcast of the mass rally, I have reached a conclusion that there are two types of residents in Hong Kong.
The first is those who accept the jurisdiction of the constitution of the People’s Republic of China over Hong Kong, and agree that they are Hong Kong residents with Chinese citizenship.
Let's refer to this type of citizens as the “constitution-abiding people”.
The second type of residents are those who advocate that Hong Kong doesn’t belong to China, and see themselves as Hong Kong residents without Chinese citizenship. I would refer to them as the “constitution-defying protesters”.
In my view, in order to protect the “constitution-abiding people” in Hong Kong, including the frontline MTR staffers who are firmly sticking to their job and duties despite being attacked by violent protesters, there is a necessity to invoke the Emergency Regulations Ordinance.
Taking into account various factors, we can say that there could be up to a million “constitution-defying protesters” in the city. Among them, quite a few may be having right of abode in foreign countries.
I think the Hong Kong government must face this reality. The rationale behind using the emergency law is not to round up the insignificant troublemakers, but rather, to seize the opportunity and regain the legislative initiative that has been lost for long.
And since the million-strong “constitution-defying protesters” don’t respect the Chinese constitution, don’t see themselves as holding Chinese citizenship, and are directly or indirectly bullying, harassing or intimidating the constitution-abiding citizens, I believe such people don’t deserve the right to stand for public elections.
One feasible way to strip these people of their right to run for public elections is to invoke a clause under the Emergency Regulations Ordinance.
By invoking the clause, we can put in place a law that would require all those who wish to stand for public elections or cast votes to present valid Mainland Travel Permit documents to the authorities.
I believe such arrangement can help make it easier to facilitate smooth transition of “one country, two systems” through 2047.
This article appeared in the Hong Kong Economic Journal on Sept 9
Translation by Alan Lee
– Contact us at [email protected]
JC/RC
-
Energising HK's creative industries through cultural big data Dr. Winnie Tang
The government has planned to allocate nearly HK$300 million for the development of Art Tech. How can the funding effectively improve the level of local culture and arts, and further consolidate Hong
-
How to well spend the HK$300 million allocated to art tech? Dr. Winnie Tang
Local movie director Chu Yuan passed away earlier. In a lament, film critic Ka Ming recalled Chu's five masterpieces in the 1960s and 1970s. In his remark, Ka criticised that like most old Hong Kong
-
A cross-border ‘yellow cow’ story Ben Kwok
Almost all overseas fellows of my age that I know came to Hong Kong during the pandemic only for one reason: to meet their parents as much as possible. But in order to see their parents in person,
-
Advancing responsible business conduct Hanscom Smith
We need only look at the front-page news to see that companies are reassessing their business practices in areas ranging from preventing and addressing forced labor in their supply chains,
-
Re-opening Hong Kong a must Brian YS Wong
Hong Kong’s value to its country remains its openness, cosmopolitanism, and fundamental willingness to embrace and take on the unknown. It is its internationalism, as opposed to inward-looking