Why vaccine skepticism is more troubling than measles itself

The measles outbreak in Hong Kong this year has set the entire city on edge.
Recently when I returned to Hong Kong from a Singapore trip, I noticed that airport staff at the arrivals terminal was on full alert, a scene that was reminiscent of the tense atmosphere witnessed during the swine flu epidemic in 2009 and the SARS outbreak in 2003.
Discussing the issue with an elderly person, I found the person dismissing outright the ongoing vigilance against measles, and dubbing the reaction as paranoia.
Explaining his view, the person argued that measles used to be quite common back in his childhood days, and hence he just saw no justification whatsoever for the current fuss over the disease.
To people who share this view, measles might appear just a storm in a teacup; as to vaccines, getting vaccinated against it or not basically won’t make any difference.
In my view, this kind of ignorance or skepticism toward vaccination is even more troublesome than the diseases which are containable through vaccination such as measles, seasonal influenza, pertussis and hepatitis.
Over the past decade, we have seen anti-vaccinationists sprouting across the world.
Where does the danger with anti-vaccinationism lie?
For those who lack natural immunity, vaccination is always the most effective, or sometimes the only available, means to prevent the deadly diseases.
In medicine, herd immunity refers to the form of immunity where a high percentage of population in a society is vaccinated, thus protecting those who have not developed immunity or have not been vaccinated.
As a result, people who have refused to get vaccinated out of skepticism and eventually contracted deadly viruses would not only put their family members and co-workers at substantial health risk, they would also increase the burden on the healthcare system.
True, vaccines are not perfect, nor do they guarantee 100 percent protection against infectious diseases, but that does not mean vaccination is not an effective measure.
One needs to understand that people who aren’t vaccinated are often several times more vulnerable to life-threatening diseases than those who got their jabs.
Besides, vaccines are effective in reducing complications and alleviating symptoms. Patients who got vaccinated have a better chance of survival and recovery than those who are unvaccinated.
I believe the overwhelming majority of anti-vaccinationists or vaccine skeptics have no intention of hurting other people. Yet, absence of intent doesn’t mean they can escape responsibility, considering the medical crises that are taking place around the world every day, and which could have been avoided.
Suffice it to say that anti-vaccinationism is more worrisome than measles itself. It is a complicated political issue as well as a farcical tragedy.
This article appeared in the Hong Kong Economic Journal on April 1
Translation by Alan Lee
– Contact us at [email protected]
JC/RC
-
More government services can soon be paid online
Oftentimes, crisis is the best agent to trigger changes, which would otherwise take much longer to happen. As more people go online to shop or order food through apps amid the pandemic, the
-
Today’s surreal Hong Kong: Be careful what you say or do Michael Chugani
Hong Kong politics is now surreal. Think twice before you say or do anything. Forget about Chief Executive Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor’s assurances that free speech still exists. It does not. Expect a
-
Striking a balance between development and conservation Ryan Ip Man-ki and Jacqueline Hui
Despite the land shortage, Hong Kong needs to strike a sensible balance between building houses and caring for our natural habitats, that is why the government should keep an open mind and look at
-
Make good use of advanced technology to curb the epidemic Dr. Winnie Tang
The fourth wave of the COVID-19 epidemic is unpredictable and unstable, it is inevitable that the public is experiencing anti-epidemic fatigue. The epidemic has lasted for a year, do we have a more
-
Civil disservice Neville Sarony
For anyone in a position of power, whether they seized it or were elected to it, there is a correlative responsibility to those over whom the power is exercised. Whereas it is true that autocrats’
-
Adelson made Macao, Macao made Adelson
-
Civil disservice
-
Today’s surreal Hong Kong: Be careful what you say or do
-
Make good use of advanced technology to curb the epidemic
-
England’s lockdown lessons
-
Striking a balance between development and conservation
-
Surprises keep hitting the financial market
-
COVID-19 and the Doomsday Clock
-
More government services can soon be paid online