Cardinal Pell allowed to challenge sexual abuse conviction

November 13, 2019 09:58
Former Vatican treasurer George Pell is serving a six-year jail sentence for sexually assaulting two teenage choirboys. Photo: AFP

Australia’s High Court agreed to hear a final appeal from former Vatican treasurer George Pell over his conviction for sexually assaulting two teenage choirboys,  Reuters reports.

Pell, who is in jail serving a six-year sentence handed down by a lower court in March, turned to the High Court after a first appeal upheld his conviction.

The High Court appeal hearing, to be presided over by a full bench of five or seven judges, will be held in March 2020 at the earliest, a court spokesman said.

Pell, the most senior Catholic official worldwide to be jailed for child sex offenses, will remain in prison while his lawyers prepare for the High Court appeal.

Pell was convicted by a jury in the County Court of Victoria last December of abusing two 13-year-old boys at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in the late 1990s when he was archbishop of Melbourne. Under the six-year sentence he received in March, he will be eligible for parole in October 2022, when he will be 81.

A first appeal was heard by the state’s Court of Appeal, where judges upheld his conviction in a 2-1 majority in August.

Pell’s lawyers took the case to the High Court on the basis the Court of Appeal was wrong to have found that the jury’s verdict was not unreasonable.

Lawyers also argued the majority judges had erred in shifting the burden of proof to the defense to show that it would have been impossible for Pell to have committed the offenses.

The High Court on Wednesday ordered Pell’s lawyers to file their arguments for appeal by Jan. 8, with the crown prosecutors’ response due on Feb. 5.

Pell no longer has any position in the Vatican but remains a cardinal. The Pope has declined to comment on the case until the appeals process is exhausted.

For Pell to be dismissed from the priesthood, the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith would have to find him guilty following a separate canonical trial or a shorter process.

– Contact us at [email protected]