Is HK Human Rights and Democracy Act a piece of scrap paper?
Following the passage of The Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act by both the US Senate and the House of Representatives, US President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed it into law.
The legislation requires the US State Department to certify, at least annually, that Hong Kong retains enough autonomy to justify favorable US trading terms.
Congress passed a second bill, which Trump also signed, banning the export to the Hong Kong police of crowd-control munitions such as teargas, pepper spray, rubber bullets and stun guns.
Since the outbreak of the protest movement in June, not only has the government continued to ignore mounting public calls for the setting up of an independent commission of inquiry, but has turned a blind eye to the escalating abuse of power and brutality of the police.
Meanwhile, more than 5,000 people have been arrested and countless injured.
The rapidly deteriorating situation in Hong Kong had prompted the US Senate to activate the “hotline” process in order to expedite the scrutiny of the bill.
Republican Senator Marco Rubio, one of the leading advocates of the bill, said in his speech: “Today, the United States Senate sent a clear message to Hong Kongers fighting for their long-cherished freedoms: we hear you, we continue to stand with you, and we will not stand idly by as Beijing undermines your autonomy.”
A few days ago, the Legislative Affairs Commission of the National People’s Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) strongly criticized the HKSAR High Court for declaring the anti-mask law passed by the government “unconstitutional”, stressing that the power to decide whether or not any piece of legislation in our city complies with the Basic Law rests solely and exclusively with the NPCSC.
Beijing’s words have shocked the city's legal community. The Hong Kong Bar Association immediately issued a statement warning that the NPCSC’s criticism would undermine our city’s judicial independence. Former Chief Justice Andrew Li Kwok-nang insisted that it is within the jurisdiction of our courts to decide whether a law is unconstitutional or not.
As far as the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act is concerned, the People’s Daily has recently run a commentary on its front page, which referred to the bill as a piece of “scrap paper”.
But if the bill was really as insignificant as the People’s Daily claimed, then why would Beijing protest so ferociously against it seven times on different occasions in just a span of half a day?
This article appeared in the Hong Kong Economic Journal on Nov 26
Translation by Alan Lee with additional reporting
– Contact us at [email protected]
RT/CG
-
Which HK district is most defensive in home rental? Ben Kwok
Yes, the border is open. Yet, the business is not back. That has been reflected in the residential rental market in Hong Kong, where 90 per cent was below the pre-pandemic level, according to
-
Talent development takes years, so we should start now Dr. Winnie Tang
Recently, the fever of artificial intelligence-powered chatbot ChatGPT has swept around the world. Within just two months after its launch in last November, it reached 100 million users. But if you
-
Hong Kong needs a new approach to talent Daniel Cham
Hong Kong has arrived at a critical juncture for its talent market and its economic future. Due to several factors that include the pandemic, emigration, and an ageing population, Hong Kong has a
-
Hong Kong Ballet premieres Coco Chanel Kevin Ng
Hong Kong’s cultural scene is bouncing back. Just after the Hong Kong Arts Festival, Art Basel has returned after three years. And nearby at the Academy for Performing Arts, Hong Kong Ballet
-
How to position our AI supercomputer centre? Dr. Winnie Tang
Professor Sun Dong, Secretary for Innovation and Technology and Industry, said that the investment in the proposed AI supercomputer center would be “huge”, and "if you make reference to supercomputer
