Put the theme parks out of their misery

What happens when the government gets involved in running massive entertainment complexes? The answer is obvious because everything the Hong Kong government touches has a habit of turning to dust. Things get even worse when these complexes have to be shutdown due to forces beyond their control and the taxpayer is called upon to provide shovel loads of cash to keep them going.
Ocean Park, an entirely state owned enterprise, is threatened with bankruptcy and has applied for an urgent bailout of HK$5.4 billion but made it clear that it needs twice that amount for longer-term renovation.
Meanwhile the miserable failure that is the Disney theme park in Lantau has slunk deeper into the mire as it too remains shuttered in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. The difference being that despite public funds having provided the bulk of the investment, it is run by a private company. The numskulls who negotiated this deal with the Disney Corporation allowed the American company to make money regardless of whether the park earned a cent. A combination of management fees, royalty payments and other fees has given Disney earnings that it cannot make anywhere else in the world because it failed to find another sucker government prepared to make a Hong Kong-style deal.
Ocean Park, on the other hand, manages to lose money without paying a cent to a third party in America. Billions of dollars have been poured into this enterprise to make it a so called tourist attraction, catering mainly to visitors from the Mainland.
Predictably there has been whinging from former Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying via Facebook, who is trying to use this issue as yet another way of bashing the protests. However Mainland visitors are highly unlikely to return in the numbers seen before last year. Leung, seems to be unaware that the Mainland is now awash with theme parks and that PRC travellers have already set their sights on tourism well beyond Hong Kong’s borders.
The idea that more cash needs to be poured into Ocean Park to lure back these Mainland visitors is plain crazy. It is also objectionable because such lavish expenditure of taxpayers’ money should, at the very least, focus on local needs. Instead of expanding the park and making it even more glitzy, it needs to be transformed into a manageable marine centre with a focus on providing education about the oceans to both students and the wider public.
The government needs to stop obsessing about the number of visitors who can be lured to the park and start paying more attention to the quality of service it can provide, not forgetting the welfare of the 7,500 animals who live there.
As the park has barely ever made a profit, the emphasis needs to be on loss reduction and focusing on what the park can do for the Hong Kong community. This would mean a lot of downsizing but it does not mean that it needs to become a dull attraction.
A lot of imagination is required here and it is fanciful to believe that the imagination-free zone occupied by government bureaucrats can supply it. However we are where we are and simply shutting down the park is not an appealing option. What needs to happen is that the bureaucrats are firmly told to keep their itchy fingers off this project so that some real professionals can be brought in to transform Ocean Park.
The Disney park cannot be transformed because it is a franchise of an international corporation that does things in a certain way – indeed it does what it does highly successfully where it is under the gun to make the parks profitable rather than relying on a government subsidy.
Given the hopelessly bad deal made to get the park open it’s a fair bet that Disney’s lawyers inserted numerous clauses in the agreement that would make it hugely expensive to close down. Nevertheless as continued losses are more or less guaranteed and the park has more or less zero relevance to most Hongkongers, the time has almost certainly come to say bye-bye.
It will leave a deep hole in the public finances but the whole point about mistakes is that they cannot be resolved by endlessly repeating them.
-- Contact us at [email protected]
-
Financial chief earmarks HK$934 million to boost tourism
Apart from handing out HK$5,000 spending e-coupons to Hongkongers to stimulate local spending, the revival of tourism, also hard hit by the Covid-19 pandemic, is another key issue financial chief
-
When are we going to get our HK$5,000 e-vouchers?
Among the economic stimulus measures financial chief Paul Chan revealed yesterday in the 2021-22 budget, the disbursement of HK$5,000 spending e-vouchers is probably what the public is most
-
Carrie Lam is Hong Kong’s biggest failure, not RTHK Michael Chugani
Normally I would focus on Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po's budget whichhe unveiled yesterday. Not this year, except to say he tried his best with an austerity budget that still offered HK$5,000
-
Getting a jab: One step closer to Covid travel visa Ben Kwok
Whether Hong Kong people would take the vaccine shot from Sinovac or BioNTech is less of a question than when they can fly to where they want with the vaccine passport. In the first place, who wants
-
New levy and more RVMs to boost waste recycling efforts
To move toward the city’s long term waste reduction goal, the government is proposing a recycling levy on makers and importers of plastic beverage bottles. At the same time, the government is also