As world says good riddance to 2020, China hails its new status

The Chinese government, while congratulating itself on its “extremely extraordinary” success in handling the Covid-19 coronavirus epidemic and the quick recovery of its economy, is attempting to control and channel an investigation by the World Health Organization into the origin of the virus, first reported in Wuhan in December 2019.
While much of the world sees 2020 as an “annus horribilis” – a horrible year – in China’s assessment it was a wonderful year. As the official Xinhua News Agency said in a New Year’s Day commentary, 2020 was “an extraordinary year in history that saw the Covid-19 pandemic bringing an unprecedented challenge to mankind as well as a fast-evolving international architecture” and, as 2021 begins, “China is standing on a new historical starting point.”
That is to say, China’s position in the world has been much elevated as a result of the pandemic, despite criticism that its early missteps and cover-ups made possible the spread of the virus around the world.
China’s new status is in line with the latest projection by the Center for Economics and Business Research in the United Kingdom, which now expects the Chinese economy to overtake that of the United States in 2028, five years earlier than originally expected.
To ensure that the party’s assessment of itself is shared by the rest of the world, China has gone to great lengths to ensure that the investigation into the origins of the coronavirus, which enters a new stage this month with the arrival in China of a 10-member international team, doesn’t poke among the embers and uncover anything embarrassing for China.
China strenuously opposed the idea of a probe when Australia called for an independent inquiry. However, support was widespread and the World Health Assembly – the decision-making body of the World Health Organization – last May unanimously adopted a resolution “to identify the zoonotic source of the virus and the route of introduction to the human population, including the possible role of intermediate hosts … to reduce the risk of similar events….”
Although the mission is couched entirely in scientific concepts – to identify the animal source of the virus that jumped into a human being – any close look at what China did in those days is politically sensitive to China, which at that time had tried to cover up, to deny and to delay. An advance WHO team last summer didn’t even get to Wuhan.
China has sought to divert attention from Wuhan and has played up reports that the coronavirus had been found in waste water in such countries as Spain and Italy before the Wuhan outbreak.
Hua Chunying, spokesperson of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, said at a press conference that worldwide reports show “the virus broke out at multiple locations worldwide, which requires international research and cooperation by scientists across the globe.”
While China has accepted that the WHO will begin its investigation in Wuhan, the global health body said in an agreement with Beijing that “the global origin tracing work is … not bound to any location and may evolve geographically as evidence is being generated, and hypotheses evolve.”
Beginning the inquiry in Wuhan is vital from the WHO’s standpoint because that is where the first cases were reported. Presumably, that is where a virus jumped from an animal into a human being, something known as a spillover event. While the virus is believed to have originated in bats in Yunnan – more than 1,800 kilometers from Wuhan – there is likely to have been an intermediary animal that carried the virus from a bat and passed it on to a human. The hunt now is on for that intermediary.
The Chinese campaign at obfuscation, while invoking science, is clearly driven by politics. China is out to preserve the gains that it made in the last year by successfully controlling the coronavirus and being the first major country to return to growth.
President Xi Jinping, in his New Year address, pointed to the country’s growth, despite the virus. China, he said confidently, “is the first major economy to achieve growth,” which he said would reach the annual GDP of 100 trillion RMB, or about US$15 trillion.
With China closing in on its goal of surpassing the United States, it is unlikely to allow the international team of experts to uncover anything embarrassing in its search that might jeopardize China’s hard-won political and economic gains.
-- Contact us at [email protected]
-
How to well spend the HK$300 million allocated to art tech? Dr. Winnie Tang
Local movie director Chu Yuan passed away earlier. In a lament, film critic Ka Ming recalled Chu's five masterpieces in the 1960s and 1970s. In his remark, Ka criticised that like most old Hong Kong
-
A cross-border ‘yellow cow’ story Ben Kwok
Almost all overseas fellows of my age that I know came to Hong Kong during the pandemic only for one reason: to meet their parents as much as possible. But in order to see their parents in person,
-
Advancing responsible business conduct Hanscom Smith
We need only look at the front-page news to see that companies are reassessing their business practices in areas ranging from preventing and addressing forced labor in their supply chains,
-
Re-opening Hong Kong a must Brian YS Wong
Hong Kong’s value to its country remains its openness, cosmopolitanism, and fundamental willingness to embrace and take on the unknown. It is its internationalism, as opposed to inward-looking
-
No health without mental health Dr. Winnie Tang
The universities in Australia made a bold move last year, lowering the tuition fees by 42% in five subjects, including two medical-related subjects, nursing and clinical psychology. According to the
-
Fearful of Western sanctions,Lenovo,Xiaomi stop sales in Russia
-
Are ATM still 'uninvestable'?
-
Cloud the key for APAC banks’ digital transformation
-
The IMF is still behind the times on capital controls
-
Latest HK regulatory developments in the ESG space
-
Demystifying Oxbridge education (III)
-
Another global recession?
-
Preparing for climate overshoot
-
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush