China says “patriotism” in Hong Kong means loving the party
Eight months after imposing a national security law on Hong Kong, Beijing is moving to tighten its grip over the supposedly highly autonomous region, with China’s National People’s Congress expected to review legislation next week that would ensure that anyone elected to any office – from district councilors who deal with garbage disposal to the Chief Executive—would in China’s eyes be a “patriot” who supports the communist party.
Within Hong Kong, the crackdown continued with the arrest on Sunday of 47 former lawmakers and activists charged with “conspiracy to commit subversion,” which carries a possible life sentence.
Meanwhile, the western world continues to support Hong Kong, with Canada announcing in early February– days after a British initiative to accept up to five million Hongkongers came into effect – that Hong Kong residents could apply for work permits that could lead to permanent residency.
China’s emphasis on loyalty to the party marks a departure from what the late paramount leader Deng Xiaoping, who decided to take Hong Kong back from Britain in 1997, had pledged to the people of the then British colony.
Xia Baolong, a Chinese official responsible for Hong Kong affairs, disclosed last week that Beijing would unilaterally implement changes to Hong Kong’s systems to “ensure that the members of the administrative, legislative and judicial bodies of the special administrative region and the heads of important statutory bodies are all held by true patriots.”
As for how to define a patriot, Xia, director of State Council’s Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office, cited Deng’s definition of June 1984. Deng said, “A patriot is one who respects the Chinese nation, sincerely supports the motherland’s resumption of sovereignty over Hong Kong and wishes not to impair Hong Kong’s prosperity and stability.”
Xia did not quote Deng’s next sentence: “Those who meet these requirements are patriots, whether they believe in capitalism or feudalism or even slavery. We don’t demand that they be in favor of China’s socialist system; we only ask them to love the motherland and Hong Kong.”
But Xia urged the need to uphold the Chinese constitution, which was amended in 2018 by the addition of the words “Communist Party of China” and its “leadership” to the document’s main body.
This is clearly contrary to Deng’s pledge.
But it is one that has already been adopted by the Hong Kong administration, with Erick Tsang, secretary for constitutional and mainland affairs, asserting, “You cannot say that you are patriotic but you do not love the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party or you do not respect it – this does not make sense.” He added: “Patriotism is holistic love.”
Deng showed wisdom in deciding not to politicize Hong Kong. If Hong Kong is to remain an international financial center, it is important that the global financial services community has confidence in the integrity of its institutions, especially those having to do with the stock and futures exchanges, banking, anticorruption and, most importantly, the judiciary. Hong Kong’s Basic Law provides that foreigners can serve as judges and up to 20 percent of legislators can be foreign nationals. An emphasis on patriotism puts such people in an awkward position, to put it mildly.
It is somewhat reassuring that Xia, in his speech, asserted that “the vast majority of Chinese citizens in Hong Kong society are patriotic,” with only a few “anti-China rioters.”
This being the case, it would appear unnecessary to subject everyone to a loyalty test and, in particular, to insist on allegiance to the communist party. Over the years, China has seen no shortage of political turmoil. Deng wanted a buffer between Hong Kong and the mainland’s internal political debates.
That buffer helped smooth Hong Kong’s return to China; it is still needed as long as “one country, two systems” continues.
After all, China recognizes that a special administrative region, which is the constitutional status of Hong Kong, has a political system different from that on the mainland.
Xia, in his speech, said that “political dissent can be allowed” but it cannot be allowed “to damage the fundamental system of the country, that is, damage the leadership of the Communist Party of China.”
So, perhaps the degree of political dissent in Hong Kong will reflect the situation in the mainland, where several “minority parties” that support the Communist Party are allowed to exist.
Xia said that having patriots in charge is the only way “one country, two systems” can be successful.
But this begs the question: How is that different from one country, one system?
-- Contact us at [email protected]
-
La Scala Ballet’s Spectacular Corsaire in HK Arts Festival Kevin Ng
La Scala Ballet, the most prestigious ballet company of Italy, last performed in the Hong Kong Arts Festival exactly ten years ago. So its return to this year’s Festival with “Le Corsaire” (The
-
Status Anxiety and Norm Defiance Brian YS Wong
I am privileged to be in a position where I can learn from, and be inspired by, incredibly talented, creative, and thoughtful students on a daily basis. Teachers often learn more than students than
-
Time to revisit tree planting strategy Dr. Winnie Tang
Hong Kong Orchid Tree or Bauhinia x blakeana is our city flower, which can be found everywhere in the city, but it is also one of the most affected tree species under extreme weather. According to
-
How to encourage highly educated seniors return to workforce Dr. Winnie Tang
By 2025, there will be 300 million people over the age of 60 in China, or almost 20% of the country’s population. If these aged were to form a country, it would have the fourth highest population in
-
Is Hong Kong back or moving backwards? Michael Chugani
Hong Kong's current economic misery reminds me of the gloom during the 2003 SARS outbreak, only far worse this time. During SARS, property prices plunged, bars and restaurants were deserted, and