Politicising the coronavirus crisis
To what extent is the Hong Kong government intending to use the deadly coronavirus pandemic for political ends?
Although the usual loyalist suspects did their best to disguise their relief, it was evident that the onset of the coronavirus was welcomed by them as a way of defusing the political unrest in Hong Kong. Some were even foolish enough to think that once the virus crisis subsided the discontent would somehow be forgotten and disappear.
Now that Hong Kong appears to be emerging from the end of the tunnel that has brought life as usual to a halt the same people who thought the pandemic was good for putting an end to protest are now trying to make sure that this will be the case.
The police, who are now so self confident that they have taken it upon themselves not just to enforce the law but also to interpret it, have declared that even people practising social distancing according to the rules can still be arrested if they are acting for a ‘common purpose’. This nebulous concept appears to mean whatever the police decide that it means.
Thus, when people go to a supermarket they have the ‘common purpose’ of shopping but are not arrested for this offence, if they head into a bus where social distancing is even more difficult, they share a ‘common purpose’ of transportation. Yet even the police are not going to arrest anyone for travelling.
However using police-designed guidelines for enforcement, if people gather for a protest, albeit maintaining the required distance between each other and in groups of no more than four, out come the riot shields and all the other familiar paraphernalia of the police in action against the citizenry.
The medical imperative for social distancing therefore quickly becomes politicised. It has already been used as a pretext to ban May Day rallies and will also be deployed as a reason to prevent this year’s commemoration of the June 4 Tiananmen Square massacre.
There is even the possibility that the pandemic will be brought into play as an excuse for postponing the September Legco elections. This suggestion has already been raised by the inexorable Junius Ho, still smarting from his defeat at the November district council polls and clearly worried over his fate should he have to face the electorate in September.
And, just to prove that the Lam government will always put the interests of its masters in Beijing and members of the local elite over those of Hong Kong people, there is already talk of loosening border controls with the Mainland. In case no one in government headquarter noticed, the SAR has succeeded in getting the pandemic under better control than the Mainland.
Yet very important and well connected people in Hong Kong are itching to be allowed to travel backwards and forwards across the border to look after their business interests. And so, almost incredibly, it is seriously being suggested that these VIPs should be placed in a special category of people who are exempt from the normal quarantine restrictions. This is very much like the system of giving members of the elite special permits entitling them to drive across the border, although in this instance the consequences are infinitely more dangerous.
Meanwhile the waxworks in government and the avid red flag wavers have developed a new narrative of not only lauding the Mainland’s handling of the crisis as proof positive that dictatorships are more capable than democracies but they have taken to accusing those in the opposition of being un-patriotic for their failure to acknowledge this dubious new mantra.
They go further and say that anyone opposing the government or daring to cast doubt on the Chinese Communist Party’s handling of the crisis is sabotaging the unity required to fight the coronavirus. Now is the time, they maintain, to crackdown on dissidents and lock them away. Indeed they might also be hoping that the rest of the world will be so preoccupied with the pandemic that no one will notice or bother to respond to Hong Kong dissidents being carted off to jail.
As ever they see this crisis through the prism of their own experience which is to never waste an opportunity to serve the interests of the party. As Xi Jinping said, "it is necessary to adhere to the leadership of the party over all work. Among the party, the government, the military, the people, the academia and all circles, the party leads all."
The problem for those seeking to politicise the coronavirus crisis is that people in Hong Kong will remember how the loyalists behaved during the pandemic and it will add to discontent that continues to simmer.
-- Contact us at [email protected]
-
Integration of GIS and BIM can drive development of smart city Dr. Winnie Tang
The China Association for Geospatial Industry and Sciences (“the CAGIS”) released the Top Ten Highlights of China's Geographic Information Industry in 2023, which provides much inspiration. The
-
Equip young people for the future Dr. Winnie Tang
In late February, the inaugural flight of an air taxi from Shenzhen Shekou Cruise Homeport to Zhuhai Jiuzhou Port took only 20 minutes with an estimated one-way ticket price of 200 to 300 yuan per
-
Are we raising a generation of leaders, or of followers? Brian YS Wong
The essence of education is defined not by the facts it imparts, but the potential knowledge it inspires students to individually pursue on their own. Put it this way – the ideal form of education
-
The urgent need for reforms to sex education in Hong Kong Sharon Chau
Nearly one in every four university students (23%) in Hong Kong has been sexually harassed, according to a 2019 report published by the Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC). A 2019 study found that
-
STEAM should be linked to real life Dr. Winnie Tang
In the 2017 Policy Address, STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) education was proposed as one of the eight major directions to promote I&T development. Since then, funding has